πŸ“Š The Analytics of Accreditation: 3 Hurdles You Can Solve with Your Data Β· Thursday, September 17 Β· 12:00 PM CT / 1:00 PM ET Thu, Sept 17 Β· 12 PM CT Β· with Debbie Phelps Register Free β†’
Find Your Path
πŸ“Š VP / AVP Institutional Research

The number, and the why behind it.

Datatelligent gives IR and IE leaders a live view of enrollment, retention, and persistence β€” plus an AI assistant that explains why the numbers moved, not just what they are.

πŸ“Š Headcount, retention, and persistence β€” always current
πŸ€– Ask Fusion β€” get the "why" behind any number
πŸŽ“ Built for Higher Ed, not adapted from B2B
Always Current
Headcount, retention, and persistence on one live screen
Know the Why
Ask Fusion breaks down what's driving any number, by group
See the Pattern
Seven years of trend data, one year always in context
25+
Higher Ed institutions
1
Source of truth, every team
3–6 mo
Time to first insights
$250K
Avg. annual cost savings

What IR and IE leaders tell us before they work with us

These aren't hypothetical pain points. They come directly from conversations with Institutional Research and Effectiveness leaders like you.

πŸ”’
"Every office reports a different enrollment number"
Admissions, the Registrar, and Finance each define "enrolled" slightly differently. Reconciling them eats hours every reporting cycle.
πŸ“₯
"IPEDS and state reporting is a manual scramble"
Every federal or state submission means pulling from multiple systems by hand, cross-checking definitions, and hoping nothing was missed.
🎫
"My team is a ticket queue for ad hoc requests"
Departments submit one-off data requests constantly. There's no self-service layer, so IR becomes a bottleneck instead of a strategic function.
πŸ“
"There's no shared definition of our core metrics"
"Retention," "enrolled," and "completer" mean something slightly different depending on who's asked. There's no documented, governed definition everyone uses.
πŸ•°οΈ
"Our data infrastructure hasn't kept up"
Legacy reporting tools and manual spreadsheets can't keep pace with the volume and complexity of requests IR gets today.
πŸ§‘β€βš–οΈ
"Accreditation reviews require a fire drill"
Every accreditation or Board review means assembling data from scratch instead of pulling from a system that already has it organized and current.

Three ways we change how IR operates

We don't replace your systems. We connect them, govern the definitions inside them, and give every department a trusted number to work from.

πŸ“Š Real-Time Enrollment Snapshot

Headcount, retention, and persistence β€” one screen, always current

See exactly where enrollment stands today, how this year's cohort is retaining against last year's, and whether persistence is trending up or down β€” no waiting on a report.

βœ“
Headcount, FTE, and credit hours tracked side-by-side, updated daily
βœ“
First-year retention compared cohort-over-cohort, with the point change called out
βœ“
Degree-seeking persistence tracked fall-to-spring, current vs. prior year
βœ“
One screen replaces the spreadsheet stitched together from three offices
See it applied to your institution β†’
Enrollment Counts dashboard screenshot
πŸ€– Fusion Platform β€” AI Assistant

Ask why it happened β€” not just what happened

The Fusion Platform's AI assistant doesn't just report the number β€” it breaks down what's driving it by group, flags what to watch, and recommends the next step to check.

βœ“
"Why has retention declined?" β†’ an instant, group-by-group breakdown
βœ“
Surfaces which populations are driving the change, and by how much
βœ“
Flags bright spots and areas to watch automatically
βœ“
Recommends a concrete next step, not just a chart
Request a live demo β†’
Ask Fusion AI assistant screenshot
πŸ“‰ Multi-Year Trend View

See this year in the context of the last seven

Toggle between headcount, FTE, and credit hours β€” and between bar and line views β€” to see whether this year's numbers are a blip or the start of a trend.

βœ“
Seven years of headcount, FTE, and credit hours in one view
βœ“
Current year automatically flagged against the historical pattern
βœ“
Switch between bar and line views instantly
βœ“
Built for board and cabinet packets β€” no rebuilding the chart every cycle
See trend detection in action β†’
Enrollment Trends chart screenshot

From the people doing this work

Real feedback from Institutional Research and Effectiveness leaders who've been through it.

⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
Day-by-day institutional visibility
"

Working with Datatelligent to build our data lake has been transformative. We now have the flexibility to create the specific data views our teams need while upholding student privacy, and crucially, we can finally look back historically, day by day.

πŸ‘€
Deborah Phelps
Executive Director of Institutional Effectiveness, Cowley College
⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
$250,000 / year saved
"

I used to spend a quarter million dollars a year on systems and people to manage data and get the same insights Datatelligent delivers for a fraction of the price. They are disrupting the market with their subscription model.

πŸ‘€
Joseph Cassidy
AVP Economic Development & Dean of Continuing Ed, College of DuPage
⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
Faster, more confident decisions
"

Working with Datatelligent will enable our strategic team to craft and adjust our activities with confidence and help us advance our data-informed organizational goals. Their partnership approach is unmatched.

πŸ‘€
Jill Albin-Hill
VP of Technology & Operations, Dominican University

What IR looks like 6 months after go-live

Not aspirational. Based on what our current clients tell us after they've been live for one full reporting cycle.

01
No more reconciling five versions of the same number
Every department pulls from the same governed metrics layer. Reporting cycles stop starting with a data-matching exercise.
02
Ad hoc requests to IR drop dramatically
Departments self-serve trusted answers through the Fusion AI assistant. Your team's time shifts from ticket-fulfillment to strategic analysis.
03
IPEDS and state reporting stop being a fire drill
Governed, IPEDS-aligned metrics are ready well before the deadline. Data gaps surface weeks in advance, not the week submissions are due.
04
Accreditation reviews pull from a system that's already organized
A full audit trail for every governed metric means accreditation and Board data requests are a query, not a project.

See it applied to your institution's metrics

Not a product tour. A 45-minute working session built around your current definitions, your reporting cycles, and the requests your team fields most.

🎬 Request a Use-Case Demo πŸ“… Book a 30-min Strategy Session πŸŽ“ Join the Next AI Workshop

No sales pressure. No generic demo. You'll talk to someone who's worked with institutions like yours.

Not in IR? Start here.

Every role in your institution faces different data challenges. We've built use-case pages for each one.

πŸ›οΈ
President / Cabinet
Get a unified view of institutional performance so leadership makes faster, aligned decisions.
πŸ’»
CIO / CTO
Build a data architecture that connects every system and makes AI possible β€” without ripping out what already works.
πŸŽ“
VP Student Affairs
Identify at-risk students earlier. Understand which interventions actually move the needle.
Latest News
Days
Hours
Minutes